Once the revocation is effective, the applicant cannot be held responsible for the acceptance of the offer. Therefore, the one who offers cannot be held responsible for a lack of commissions. The question that arises is when the person can ensure the previously made offer. It is very clear, assuming that in the case of a special oath, before the completion of the identical is often not allowed retraction. A sufficient reason should be demonstrated before being extracted from the agreement. 39 If the seller is willing and willing to deliver the goods and asks the buyer to accept delivery and the buyer cannot, within a reasonable time after such an invitation, refuse delivery of the goods, the buyer shall be liable to the seller for any loss resulting from its negligence or refusal to accept delivery, and also for a reasonable fee for the maintenance and preservation of the goods, except as provided in this section, affects the rights of the seller when the omission or refusal of delivery by the buyer implies the termination of the contract. R.S., at 408, p. 39. This article was written by Dhananjai Singh Rana, who follows BBA LLB(H), Amity Law School Noida This article deals with the analysis of the concept of specific products and the contract of sale, with particular emphasis on the relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act 1872. (j) “ownership” means general ownership of property and not just a particular property; 2. Where the seller is in possession of the carrier or another in possession of the goods, informed of the interruption of transit transport, he shall hand over the goods to the seller or according to the seller`s instructions, and the costs of such delivery shall be borne by the seller.
R.S., at 408, p. 47. (2) If the buyer or his agent receives delivery of the goods on this behalf before their arrival at the agreed destination, the transit is complete. 2. Nothing in this Act affects an order relating to the security of personal property or an order relating to the sale of property that is not expressly repealed by chapter 1 of the statutes of 1910. 47 (1) An unpaid seller may exercise his right to tender in transit either by actually taking possession of the goods or by giving the carrier or other surety in possession of the goods his claim, and such notification may be made either by the person actually in possession of the goods or by his principal and, in the latter case, by effective termination at a time and in such circumstances. n that the contracting entity may, in the exercise of due diligence, communicate them to its representative in good time in order to prevent delivery to the buyer. 4. If the goods are rejected by the buyer and the carrier or any other guarantor is still in the possession of the buyer, the transit shall not be considered complete even if the seller has refused to recover them. There are 4 types of goods under the 1930 Act: 44 (1) The unpaid seller of goods loses his right of deposit or withholding (3) If there is an available market for the subject goods, the measure of injury must be determined because of the difference between the contract price and the current market or price at the time or time, in which the goods have been accepted or, if no time limit has been set for acceptance, it is at the time of refusal of acceptance. .
. .